THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID L. HECHT and L. NOAH FLORES
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2690
Application No. 08/532,040
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 5, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a record for storing
encoded digital information. The record includes a self-
clocking data code pattern of glyphs for encoding the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007