Ex parte SUNDSTROM et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-2769                                                        
          Application No. 08/138,649                                                  


          can be configured by the operator.  Claim 1 is illustrative of              
          the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                             
          1.   A computer system for monitoring a plurality of                        
          telecommunication switches in a telecommunications network                  
          comprising:                                                                 
               input means for receiving network events consisting of                 
               alarms and messages reporting a failure from a                         
               telecommunication switch in the telecommunications                     
               network;                                                               
               display means for graphically presenting, using icons,                 
               only the highest existing severity level of said network               
               events for an individual telecommunications switch, and                
               presenting diagnostic routines executing for said                      
               telecommunications switch for curing the said failure of               
               the telecommunications switch;                                         
               wherein the presentation of the display means is                       
               dynamically configurable.                                              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Welch et al. (Welch)          5,319,363                Jun. 07,             
          1994                                                                        
                                                      (filed Aug. 20, 1992)           
          Appellants' Admitted Prior Art as disclosed on page 1, line 14              
          to page 2, line 20 of the specification (APA)                               
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over APA in view of Welch.                                     
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 13,              
          mailed August 26, 1996) for the examiner's complete reasoning               

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007