The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT E. QUINN, W. MICHAEL BURK
WILLIAM S. HENRY and STEVEN A. GOODLIVE
_____________
Appeal 1997-2805
Application 08/355,7121
______________
Before: WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Upon consideration of the appeal brief and the examiner's
answer, it is
Application for patent filed 14 December 1994. According to applicants, the1
application on appeal is a continuation-in-part of application 07/709,745, filed 3 June
1991. The real party in interest is The Lubrizol Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007