Ex parte YOSHIMURA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-2808                                                        
          Application No. 08/313,129                                                  
          Mfg. v. SGS Importers Int’l, 73 F.3d at 1087, 37 USPQ2d at                  
          1239, citing W. L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721               
          F.2d at 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.                                
                   Since there is no evidence in the record that the                 
          prior art suggested the desirability of the proffered                       
          modification, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of               
          independent claims 2, 9, 10 and 15, all of which contain the                
          alternating language discussed supra.                                       
                    The remaining claims on appeal also contain the                   
          above limitations discussed in regard to the independent                    
          claims and thereby, we will not sustain the rejection as to                 
          these claims.                                                               












                   We have not sustained the rejection of claims 2                   
          through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Accordingly, the Examiner's              


                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007