THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FUMISADA MAEDA and YOSHINORI MATSUMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2852
Application No. 08/354,454
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2 through 4, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a magneto-optical disc
apparatus in which the magnetic field generating means is
We observe that on March 24, 2000 (paper no. 23), appellants filed a1
waiver of the oral hearing set for April 7, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007