Ex parte DOMB et al. - Page 2



              Appeal No. 1997-2874                                                                                      
              Application 08/219,160                                                                                    



                                               REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM                                                     
                     Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                  
                     1.  Hydroxamic acid polymers comprising hydroxamic groups and carboxylic acid                      
              groups, wherein the carboxylic acid groups constitute less than about 3 mole percent of the               
              functional groups.                                                                                        


                                                   THE REFERENCES                                                       
                     The prior art references relied on by the examiner are:                                            
              Woodberry                          2,959,574                   Nov.   8, 1960                             
              Vio                                4,536,296                   Aug. 20, 1985                              


                                                       THE ISSUE                                                        
                     The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims            
              1-7 and 15-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs; and (2) whether the                     
              examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-7 and 15-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or,              
              in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Woodberry or Vio.                          


                                                    DELIBERATIONS                                                       
                     Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the following              
              materials: (1) the instant specification, including all of the claims on appeal; (2) applicants'          
              Appeal Brief; (3) the Examiner's Answer; (4) the above-cited prior art references; and (5) the            


                                                             2                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007