THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BRUCE D. LUCAS,
JAMES R. RHYNE II,
and CATHERINE G. WOLF
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2896
Application 08/340,561
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4 through 18. Claim 3 has been canceled.
The invention relates to pen based computer systems.
Specifically, as identified on page 7 of Appellants’
specification, the invention is a method of tracking the path
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007