Ex parte MULLEN - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                         

                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                       
                                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                       
                                            (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              

                                                                                                      Paper No. 23                  

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                              

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                          ____________                                                              

                                              Ex parte ROBERT E. MULLEN, JR.                                                        
                                                          ____________                                                              

                                                      Appeal No. 1997-2987                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/190,389                                                       
                                                          ____________                                                              

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                          ____________                                                              

               Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 30, all of the claims              

               pending in the application.                                                                                          

                       The invention is directed to a protocol converter for interfacing various on-line process                    

               equipment with a host computer in a semiconductor manufacturing environment.  Independent claim 1,                   

               which is representative of the claimed subject matter, is reproduced as follows:                                     









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007