Appeal No. 1997-3062
Application No. 08/207,370
We have addressed all of appellant’s arguments and do not
find any of them persuasive of patentability. Accordingly,
the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 through 3, 7, 8, 10
through 12 and 19 through 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
James D. Thomas )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Errol A. Krass ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Joseph L. Dixon )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007