THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN A. NIX, ROBERT A. WILKS, RICHARD E. KUGLER and
LEONARD E. HENRY, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3142
Application No. 08/323,660
____________
HEARD: April 7, 2000
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
5, 6, 10, 12 through 15, 23 and 24. In an Amendment After
Final (paper number 12), claims 1 and 6 were amended, and
claims 23 and 24 were canceled. The amendment had the effect
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007