The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS-FRIEDRICH HERRMANN,
BERND BACHMANN, BERNHARD HIERHOLZER
and WALTER SPALECK
__________
Appeal No. 1997-3234
Application 08/040,671
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WINTERS, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 3-5, 8, 13, 19, 21 and 22, and refusal to allow
claims 14, 16-18, 20, 24-26 as amended after final rejection and
claim 28 which was added after final rejection. These are all of
the claims remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
Appellants claim a supported polymeric catalyst made by a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007