Ex parte EYLON et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 11              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       

                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Ex parte DANIEL EYLON                                 
                              and STEPHEN W. SCHWENKER                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-3260                                  
                                Application 08/506,153                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow                 
          claims 9-12 which were added after final rejection.  These are              
          all of the claims remaining in the application.                             
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a method              


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007