Ex parte MARUI - Page 12




               Appeal No. 1997-3340                                                                         Page 12                  
               Application No. 08/323,500                                                                                            


               the invention recited in claim 10, we are constrained to reverse the examiner's 35 U.S.C.                             
               § 103 rejection of independent claim 10 and claim 11 which depends therefrom.                                         






                                                          CONCLUSION                                                                 
                       To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 3-9, 14-17, 20, 21, 23-                        
               28, 32 and 34-37 under the first and second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112, claims 1, 3, 4, 6,                         
               7, 14-17, 20-28, 32, 34-38 and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11,                          
               14-17, 20-28, 32, 34-38 and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                     
                                                           REVERSED                                                                  






                                       IRWIN CHARLES COHEN                            )                                              
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )                                              
                                                                                      )                                              
                                                                                      )                                              
                                                                                      )                                              
                                                                                      ) BOARD OF PATENT                              
                                       NEAL E.  ABRAMS                                )     APPEALS                                  
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )       AND                                    
                                                                                      )  INTERFERENCES                               
                                                                                      )                                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007