Ex parte MORI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3586                                                        
          Application No. 08/240,811                                                  


               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Jackson et al. (Jackson)          0,304,954          Mar. 1, 1989           
          (European patent application)                                               
          Senno et al. (Sumo)               1-172383           Jul. 7, 1989           
          (Japanese Kokai patent application)                                         
               The present application is a continuation of U.S.                      
          Application No. 07/595,886, filed October 1, 1990.  Appellants              
          took an appeal to this Board in the parent application, which               
          appeal included the present claims on appeal and the same                   
          prior art now applied by the examiner.  In a decision dated                 
          March 11, 1994 (Appeal No. 93-2768), the Board affirmed the                 
          examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  The present                    
          record includes declaration evidence not part of the prior                  
          appeal.                                                                     
               Appealed claims 9-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Sumo and Jackson.                                
               Upon careful consideration of the opposing arguments                   
          presented on appeal, we will not sustain the examiner's                     
          rejection.                                                                  
               In the prior appeal the Board stated the following at                  
          page 4 of the opinion:                                                      


                                         -3-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007