THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ISAO WADA, JUNICHI ARAMAKI,
AKIHISA INATANI, and YOSHIHIRO KAJIYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3977
Application No. 08/267,579
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 15, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
We observe that on December 29, 1999 (paper no. 26), appellants filed1
a waiver of the oral hearing set for January 24, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007