THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIHIKO IWANAGA, MASUMITSU INO, KIKUO
KAISE, TAKENOBU URAZONO, and HIROYUKI IKEDA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4035
Application No. 08/274,475
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 11 and 24. Claims 12 through 23
have been withdrawn from consideration.2
1We observe that on March 13, 2000 (paper no. 27), appellant filed a
waiver of the oral hearing set for April 7, 2000.
2We note that appellants state on page 2 of the Brief that claims 12
through 23 have been canceled, but we find no evidence in the record that any
claims have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007