THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANK T. HARTLEY
and JAMES H. WISE
__________
Appeal No. 1997-4050
Application 08/535,3171
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, BARRETT and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-28,
50-57 and 59.
The invention pertains to a transducer. Claims 1 and 9
are illustrative and read as follows:
Application for patent filed September 27, 1995. According to appellants, the1
application is continuation of Application 08/106,448, filed August 16, 1993, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007