Ex parte SYMKO et al. - Page 2




               Appeal No. 1997-4194                                                                                               
               Application No. 08/357,435                                                                                         


                                                         THE CLAIMS                                                               
                      Claims 1 and 11 are illustrative of appellants’ invention and are reproduced                                
               below.                                                                                                             
                      1.  An article of manufacture, comprising:                                                                  
               a quasicrystalline metal alloy film less than about 3000 Å thick, said film having a                               
                              composition of the general formula A1 Cu Fe X I , where X represents                                
                                                                            a  b  c  d e                                          
                              one or more optional alloy elements and I represents manufacturing                                  
                              impurities, and where a = 100-b-c-d-e; 24 < b < 26; 12 < c < 13;                                    
                              0 < d < 10; and 0 < e < 3.                                                                          
                      11. An article of manufacture, comprising:                                                                  
               a quasicrystalline A1CuFe alloy film less than about 3000 Å thick, formed by                                       
                      depositing in sequence on a substrate through radio frequency                                               
                      sputtering a stoichiometric amount of each respective alloy material and                                    
                      then annealing said layers, whereby to form said film through solid state                                   
                      diffusion.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                 
                                               THE REFERENCE OF RECORD                                                            
                     As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following reference.                               
               Dubois et al. (Dubois)                5,204,191                April 20, 1993                                      


                                                      THE REJECTIONS                                                              
                      Claims 1 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                            
               paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim                          
               the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.                                                   
                      Claims 1 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                               
               or, in the alternative under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Dubois.                                               

                                                                2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007