THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL W. GILPATRICK
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-4392
Application No. 08/639,515
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 12-16 in the final
rejection (Paper No. 7, mailed February 7, 1997). Claims 1-11 have been canceled.
Appellant’s invention relates to a method of producing a fabric 10 made of a plurality of core
and effect yarns 54 with loops 53. A plurality of core and effect yarns 54 are maintained spaced from
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007