Appeal No. 1997-4430
Application 08/421,463
21) also reveals the importance of the passages 86, 88, and 89
in enabling steam or other hot fluid to pass full-length
through the folded pipe for reheating and reworking after the
folded pipe is installed.
Turning now to the Laurent and Hyodo references, we are
of the opinion that these documents, collectively considered,
would not have been suggestive of the subject matter of claims
39 and 65 to one having ordinary skill in the art. We, of
course, certainly appreciate some visual similarity between
the tubular fabric 5 of Hyodo (Fig. 1) when considered
relative to the configuration shown in appellant’s Fig. 8.
However, the teaching of Hyodo must be considered as a whole
in conjunction with the overall disclosure of Laurent. From
that perspective, the tubular fabric 5 must fairly be viewed
in its proper context, i.e., as a component part, with open
holes 9, that acts together with a tubular fabric 2 and a
binder 11 to form a lining material 1 for a pipe 10 (Fig. 4),
when the composite is turned inside out. As we see it, only
reliance upon appellant’s own teaching, and not the applied
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007