Appeal No. 1998-0015
Application No. 08/388,058
Inasmuch as an explanation of the GIS system is not
present in the Moore patent, and the examiner has not provided
such an explanation, we do not have any evidence in the record
before us that the GIS system in Moore (column 2, line 66
through column 3, line 8; and column 23, lines 19 through 23)
uses a “graphical user interface” in the “linking of the
geographic information to telephone numbers.”
In summary, the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claims
1 through 8 and 20 through 31 is reversed because the examiner
has not presented a prima facie case of anticipation.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through
8 and 20 through 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is reversed.
REVERSED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007