THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CASEY K. LEE,
ROBERT A. FARRIS,
BRADLEY I. COATES
and MICHAEL C. SHERMAN
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-0169
Application 08/542,603
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner's refusal to allow
claims 1-6 and 36 as amended after final rejection. Claims 7-
29 were subject to restriction requirement and stand withdrawn
from consideration. Claims 30-35 have been canceled. These
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007