Ex parte VAN DER ZAAG et al. - Page 2




               Appeal No. 1998-0200                                                                                              
               Application No. 08/698,193                                                                                        


                      The invention is directed to the thin film structure of a magnetic head.  Claim 12 is reproduced           

               below.                                                                                                            

               12.    A thin film magnetic head comprising a thin film structure on a substrate, one end of the                  
               substrate and the thin film structure defining a head face, the thin film structure comprising at least one       
               flux guiding element of a magnetically permeable material having a relatively high magnetic permeability          
               on said substrate, a magnetoresistive element on  the flux guiding element, a peripheral area of the1                                                                 
               magnetoresistive element overlying an edge of the flux-guiding element, and an intermediate layer of an           
               electrical insulating material separating the magnetoresistive element and the flux guiding element,              
               characterized in that at least the portion of the intermediate layer which is between the peripheral area         
               of the magnetoresistive element and the flux guiding element is magnetically permeable and has a relative         
               magnetic permeability in the range of about 1.1 to 25, thereby increasing the magnetic flux between the           
               magnetoresistive element and the flux-guiding element, and improving the efficiency of the magnetic               
               head.                                                                                                             

                      The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                            

               Jeffers        4,754,354                                            Jun. 28, 1988                                 

                      Claims 2-6 and 9-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being                        

               indefinite.                                                                                                       

                      Claims 2-6, 9-12, and 15-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                     

               over Jeffers.                                                                                                     

                      We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 21) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 26) for                

               a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 25) for appellants’ position.                  



                      1In the Appendix of claims submitted with the Brief, Claim 12 is incorrectly reproduced as reading         
               “above” the flux guiding element.  The word was changed to “an” by the preliminary amendment filed                
               September 18, 1995 (Paper No. 20), which directed entry of a previously proposed amendment to the claim.          
                                                              - 2 -                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007