Ex parte DUNCAN - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0212                                       Page 4           
          Reissue Application No. 07/837,588                                          


               On June 19, 1989, the appellant filed a “Supplemental                  
          Amendment under Rule 1.312.”  (‘176 Application, Paper No.                  
          24.) The supplemental amendment attempted to cancel the                     
          nonelected claims, which had already been canceled by the                   
          Examiner’s Amendment, “for incorporation in a divisional                    
          application.”  (Id. at 1-2.)  It also attempted to cancel                   
          allowed claims 13, 27-31, and 55 for incorporation “into a                  
          continuation application.”  (Id. at 2.)  Because the                        
          supplemental amendment “reached the appropriate official for                
          action after the patent issued,” (‘176 Application, Paper No.               
          25), the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied its entry.                
          On September 25, 1989, the PTO informed the appellant of the                
          denial.  (Id.)                                                              


               On May 17, 1990, the appellant filed U.S. Patent                       
          Application No. 07/526,711 (‘711 Reissue Application), which                
          was for reissue of the ‘814 Patent.  On February 18, 1992, he               
          filed U.S. Patent Application No. 07/837,588, which was a                   
          continuation of the ‘711 Reissue Application and abandoned the              
          latter.  (Paper No. 11                                                      









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007