Ex parte PIKE - Page 4




               Appeal No. 1998-0240                                                                                                  
               Application 08/522,479                                                                                                



                       The references cited by the Board are as follows:                                                             

               Needham                                5,366,675                       Nov. 22, 1994                                  
               Bowen, Jr.                             6,007,911                       Dec. 28, 1999                                  

               Y. Lin et al., “The Effect of Pigments on the Development of Structure and Properties of                              
               Polypropylene Filaments,” ANTEC 1991, pp. 1950-1954.  (Y. Lin)                                                        


                       The Needham and Bowen patents are made of record and are cited on the attached PTO-892,                       

               with copies of these patents attached to this decision.  Y. Lin was previously made of record in the                  

               Information Disclosure Statement, Paper No. 2, filed December 20, 1995.                                               


                                                          The Rejections                                                             

                       (1)     Claims 9-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for being broader                   
               than the enabling disclosure with respect to the term “higher melting point.”                                         

                       (2)     Claims 5, 9-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as indefinite                   
               due to the recitation of “between about” to define the amounts of nucleating agent present in the                     
               compositions.                                                                                                         

                       (3)     Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as indefinite due to                  
               the recitation “increase” with regards to the level of crimping.                                                      

                       (4)     Claims 5 and 9-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Pike                   
               in view of Connor.                                                                                                    


                                                              Opinion                                                                



                                                                 4                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007