THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER D. PELEG, MILLIND MITTAL, LARRY M.
MENNEMEIER, BENNY EITAN, CAROLE DULONG, EIICHI KOWASHI and
WOLF WITT
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0524
Application No. 08/522,067
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 24 through 26 and 28 through 33, all claims pending in
this application.
The invention relates generally to the field of computer
systems, and in particular, the area of packed data
instructions. In typical computer systems, processors are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007