THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHARLES S. RICHARDSON
and ARNOLD S. LIPPA
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0640
Application 08/212,5711
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-11, all
the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a hearing aid. Claim 1 is
illustrative and reads as follows:
A hearing aid apparatus for receiving and transmitting to the
human sensory system an audio frequency signal for enabling human
1 Application for patent filed March 16, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007