Appeal No. 1998-0678
Application No. 08/411,299
perform the translation of perspective routines, such is not
taught or suggested by either Burgess or Diner. While Diner is
concerned with position and attitude, it is only for the
display of this information [column 10, lines 31-33], unlike
the instant invention which uses the information to combine the
images of different perspective, as clearly recited by instant
claim 7 via instant claim 3. Therefore, we will reverse the
rejection of claim
7 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
We have sustained the rejection of claims 1-6 and 8 under
35 U.S.C. 103 but we have reversed the rejection of claim 7
under 35 U.S.C. 103. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is
affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal my be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a)
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007