THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TAKASHI SHIOIRI
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0745
Application 08/216,8421
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 8-10 and
12-14, all the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a medical image processor. Claim
8, the sole independent claim, is illustrative and reads as
follows:
8. A medical image processor for correlating and analyzing
at least two comparison images, comprising:
Application for patent filed March 24, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007