Ex parte WOODS et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 20           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                      Ex parte CHARLES L. WOODS, JEHAD KHOURY                         
                                     and JACK FU                                      
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-0818                                  
                             Application No. 08/319,143                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LALL, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 3, 4, 6, 7 and 11 through 14.  Claims 1, 2, 5, 8                     
          through 10 were canceled.                                                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007