Ex parte SIEGRIST et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                    
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                      
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
                                                               Paper No. 15            


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   ________________                                    
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   ________________                                    
                   Ex parte RONALD SIEGRIST and BRUNO J. STILLHARD                     
                                   ________________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1008                                  
                              Application No. 08/574,358                               
                                   ________________                                    
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                   ________________                                    

          Before CALVERT, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                      
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21                 
          to 26, all the claims remaining in the application.                          
               The claims on appeal are drawn to an injection molding                  
          machine having a movable die section (claims 21 to 23), and a                
                                         -1-                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007