Ex Parte SHIBAHASHI et al - Page 4




               Appeal No. 1998-1015                                                                                                   
               Application No. 08/208,912                                                                                             


               are told that "[a] feature of the coloring material of the invention is that it exhibits a color                       
               holding temperature within the range of 10-35/C.  Thus, either of two colors can be held                               
               at or near ambient temperature." (page 7 of brief).                                                                    
                       The present application is a continuation of grandparent application U.S. Serial                               
               No. 07/443, 872, filed November 30, 1989.  An appeal was taken to this Board in the                                    
               grandparent application on claims which are essentially the same as those presently                                    
               before us.  In a decision dated November 20, 1992, a merits panel of this Board                                        
               sustained the examiner's rejection of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                                   
               the same prior art now applied to instant independent claim 15.                                                        
                       Appellants submit at page 6 of the brief that "[c]laims 15, 5-9 and 11-13 stand or                             
               fall together".  Accordingly, all the appealed claims stand or fall together with                                      
               independent claim 15.                                                                                                  
                       Appealed claims 15, 5-9, 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                     
               being unpatentable over Shibahashi in view of Kito '301 and Kito '565.  Claim 12 stands                                


               rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the stated combination of                                    
               references further in view of Shimizu.                                                                                 
                       We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellants' arguments for patentability, as                                
               well as the declaration evidence relied on in support thereof.  However, for the reasons                               
               set forth by the examiner and articulated in the prior Board decision, we find that the                                

                                                                  4                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007