Ex parte WIEDNER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1240                                                        
          Application 08/198,443                                                      


          specifically, to a removable basketball backboard cover”                    




          (specification, page 1).  A copy of the appealed claims                     
          appears in Appendix A of the appellant’s main brief (Paper No.              
          10).                                                                        
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          anticipation and obviousness are:                                           
          Tompkins                 663,306                  Dec.   4, 1900            
          Mosgoffian               2,048,461                Jul.  21, 1936            
          Johnson                       2,052,771                Sept.  1,            
          1936        Bardin                 2,434,784                Jan.            
          20, 1948                                                                    
          Puste                    2,652,875                Sept. 22, 1953            
          Henrich                  2,704,563                Mar.  22, 1955            
          Woodruff, Sr. (Woodruff) 2,764,765                Oct.   2, 1956            
          Hirsch                   3,622,155                Nov.  23, 1971            
          Anglin et al. (Anglin)   5,018,564                May.  28, 1991            
          Wetzel                   5,120,054                Jun.   9, 1992            
          Zaruba                   5,224,699                Jul.   6, 1993            
               Claims 1 through 11 and 13 through 26 stand rejected as                
          follows:                                                                    
               a) claims 1 through 3, 6, 8 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. §                   
          102(b) as bing anticipated by Puste;                                        
               b) claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                 
          over Puste in view of Anglin;                                               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007