THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROYUKI MANO, KIYOKAZU NISHIOKA,
TOSHIO FUTAMI, and KIYOSHIGE KINUGAWA
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1319
Application No. 08/466,188
____________
HEARD: May 15, 2000
____________
Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 9, 10, 15, and 18 through 44, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a method of displaying a
multi-tone image in response to an analog image signal and a
matrix display device which displays the multi-tone image.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007