The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUJI IGARASHI, JUN YONEMITSU,
YOICHI YAGASAKI, YASUSHI FUJINAMI,
TOMOYUKI SATO, MOTOKI KATO,
and TERUHIKO SUZUKI
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1322
Application No. 08/454,068
____________
HEARD: May 16, 2000
____________
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 5, 11, 14, and 18. We
reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to
predictive encoding and decoding of a television picture. By
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007