Ex parte HALL et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-1357                                                        
          Application No. 08/348,744                                                  


               Claims 89, 92, 93, 107 through 112, 114, 115, 118, 119,                
          122, 123, 126 through 128, 130, 132 through 135 and 138                     
          through 141 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                
          unpatentable over Lindquist in view of Kettlewell, Pritchard,               
          Setzekorn and Mapes.                                                        


               Claims 123, 135, 137 and 140 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist in view                
          of Kettlewell.                                                              


               Claim 137 additionally stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist in view of                    
          Johnston.                                                                   


               Claims 152 and 154 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                    
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Lindquist in view of Searle.              


               Claims 109, 115, 128, 130 and 141 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kettlewell in                 
          view of Lindquist.                                                          


                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007