Ex parte HALL et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte WILLIAM Y. HALL                                
                                 and WILLIAM A. HALL                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1426                                 
                               Application 08/315,350                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 5, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 20 and                 
          30, and from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 33 through              
          35 which are subject to new grounds of rejection in the                     


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007