Appeal No. 1998-1521
Application No. 08/584,990
is much different from any type of control effected upon the
CRT by Femal and there is absolutely no suggestion in Femal
for the claimed control of the modulation of a laser source
and its directed laser light spot upon a photoreceptive
surface.
Accordingly, the examiner's rejection of claim 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007