Ex parte CIOTOLA - Page 13




          Appeal No. 98-1523                                        Page 13           
          Application No. 08/705,744                                                  


               (4) The examiner’s 102(b) rejection of claims 18, 20, 23-              
          25 and 27 as anticipated by Duffee is not sustained.                        
               (5) The examiner’s 102(b) rejection of claims 20, 24, 25               
          and 27 as anticipated by Malmstrom is not sustained.                        




































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007