Ex parte HAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1700                                                        
          Application No. 08/268,460                                                  


          Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads              
          as follows:                                                                 
               1.   A symbol timing recovery apparatus for sampling a                 
          received signal containing symbols which is received in a                   
          receiver of a high-speed data transmission system, and for                  
          recovering a symbol timing of the received symbols, said                    
          symbol timing apparatus comprising:                                         
               means for receiving the signal;                                        
               means for generating a sinusoidal wave based on said                   
          received signal for recovering the symbol timing;                           
               means for detecting a positive-going zero-crossing point               
          of the sinusoidal wave; and                                                 
               means for generating a sampling clock to sample the                    
          received signal based on a plurality of positive-going zero-                
          crossing points detected by said means for detecting a                      
          positive-going zero-crossing point.                                         
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Tjahjadi et al. (Tjahjadi)        5,001,729       Mar. 19, 1991             
               Claims 1 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                
          as being anticipated by Tjahjadi.                                           
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 18,              
          mailed April 29, 1997) and the Supplemental Examiner's Answer               
          (Paper No. 21, mailed October 16, 1997) for the examiner's                  
          complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to                      

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007