THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PETER M. PERTHOU
__________
Appeal No. 1998-1946
Application No. 08/629,9911
__________
HEARD: April 5, 2000
__________
Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, NASE
and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1In the division-continuation application transmittal
form filed April 8, 1996, appellant requested an amendment
to the specification to identify appellant’s parent
application. It does not appear that this amendment was
entered.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007