THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KLAUS KIETZER
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2026
Application No. 08/508,738
______________
HEARD: MAY 1, 2000
_______________
Before COHEN, MCQUADE, AND BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
6 through 10, all of the claims remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus for the
dustfree discharge of fine dust from a dust collector of a
cleaning vehicle. A basic understanding of the invention can
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007