Ex parte HENRICKSON et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1998-2044                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/719,773                                                                                                             


                 Such a structure is disclosed to exhibit better performance                                                                            
                 characteristics than conventional FETs.                                                                                                
                 Representative claim 10 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                      
                          10.  A semi-conductor device comprising:                                                                                      
                          a semiconductor substrate of a first conductivity type;                                                                       
                          a source region and a drain of a second conductivity type                                                                     
                 formed in the substrate and separated by a channel length;                                                                             
                          a buried channel region of the second conductivity type                                                                       
                 formed between the source region and the drain region; and                                                                             
                          a surface channel region of the first conductivity type                                                                       
                 formed between the source region and the drain region, said                                                                            
                 surface channel region having a surface channel length less                                                                            
                 than the channel length between said source and drain regions.                                                                         
                 The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                                       
                 Kagami                      61-256769             Nov. 14,                                                                             
                 1986                                                                                                                                   
                 (Japanese Kokai Koho)                                                                                                                  
                 Yazawa et al. (Yazawa)      62-241378             Oct. 22,                                                                             
                 1987                                                                                                                                   
                 (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                                       
                 Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                                                                 
                 paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and                                                                                   
                 distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 10-23  stand rejected                    1                                                     

                          1Although the final rejection and the examiner’s answer                                                                       
                 list only claims 16-23 as being rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                             
                 103, this appears to be a typographical error.  We will                                                                                
                 consider all the pending claims as subject to this rejection                                                                           
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007