Appeal No. 1998-2517
Application 08/317,129
Miyazaki in view of IBM and Oliver.
6. Claims 58 and 63 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Miyazaki in view
of IBM, Oliver and Katz.
7. Claims 66-74 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Miyazaki in view of
IBM and Katz.
8. Claims 66-74 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Miyazaki in view of
IBM, Oliver and Katz.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the main brief and the answer1
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the
examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise,
1Appellants filed a reply brief on April 3, 1997 which
was denied entry by the examiner. Accordingly, we have not
considered this reply brief in the preparation of this
decision.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007