Ex parte HURST et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-2556                                                        
          Application 08/571,044                                                      


          In summary, we have sustained the rejection of claims                       
          10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because appellants have                     
          offered no response to the rejection.  We have not sustained                
          any of the prior art rejections of claims 1-8 and 10-22.                    
          Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-8              
          and 10-22 is affirmed-in-part.                                              
          No time period for taking any subsequent action in                          
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
          AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                                            





                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         MICHAEL R. FLEMING            )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )  APPEALS AND                 
                                                      )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         STUART N. HECKER              )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              




                                        -12-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007