Appeal No. 1998-2579
Application 08/350,195
retrieving from said disk-array and transmitting to said
client said identified subset of video streams so as to
minimize buffer space required by said server for storage of
video data; and
wherein rate staggering is employed to store data
corresponding to different data rates of a video clip into
different disks in said disk array.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Birk 5,510,905 Apr. 23, 1996
(filed Sep. 28, 1993)
P. Lougher et al. (Lougher), “Scalable Storage Servers For
Digital Audio and Video,” Storage and Recording Systems, 5-7
April 1994, Conference Publication No. 402, pages 140-143.
Claims 1, 4, 7, 8 and 10 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103. As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Lougher
in view of Birk.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007