Ex Parte ABECASSIS - Page 3



          Appeal No. 1998-2602                                                        
          Application 08/303,158                                                      

               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Von Kohorn               5,227,874           Jul. 13, 1993                  
          Ushiki et al. (Ushiki)2 5,438,356            Aug.  1, 1995                  
                                   (Filing date: May  19, 1993)                       
               Claims 1, 7, 10, 14, 16 and 19 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103 over Ushiki and Von Kohorn.                                 
               Rather than repeat in toto the positions and the arguments             
          of Appellant or the Examiner, we make reference to the brief and            
          the answer for their respective positions.                                  
          OPINION                                                                     
              We have considered the rejection advanced by the Examiner.             
          We have, likewise, reviewed  Appellant’s arguments against the              
          rejection as set forth in the brief.                                        
          We affirm.                                                                  
               In rejecting a claim under 35 U.S.C. § 103, an examiner is             
          under a burden to make out a prima facie case of obviousness.  If           
          that burden is met, the burden of going forward then shifts to              

               2                                                                      
               2The instant application was filed on September 8, 1994, and           
          is a continuation-in-part of 08/002,998, filed on January 11,               
          1993, which was in turn a continuation-in-part of 07/832,335,               
          filed on February 7, 1992.  Thus, even though the grand parent-             
          in-part dates before the filing date of the Ushiki reference,               
          Appellant has not raised the issue of the possibility of the                
          benefit of the earlier filing date.  We assume that the Ushiki              
          reference is valid against the claims on appeal in accordance               
          with the final rejection on appeal.                                         
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007