Ex parte ZACHARIAS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2834                                                        
          Application 08/659,858                                                      


          invention relates to a disposable absorbent article having an               
          adhesive disposed adjacent to a wearer’s skin.  More                        
          particularly, the invention relates to a catamenial device                  
          having a supportive adhesive residing on the bodyside surface               
          of the device.”  Appellants maintain that                                   
               [i]t is important to the invention that the adhesive                   
               (22) have a specific tan * rheological parameter.                      
               The adhesive tan * resides inside the quadrangle                       
               ABCD.  The quadrangle ABCD is defined by graphically                   
               plotting frequency (in radians per second) verse                       
               [sic, versus] tan * (referenced to about 20E                           
               Centigrade).  The quadrangle ABCD has as points A                      
               and D a tan * of about 0.06 and 0.4 respectively at                    
               a frequency of about 0.1 radians per second and                        
               points B and C at a tan * of about 0.1 and about 1.7                   
               respectively at a frequency of about 1000 radians                      
               per second.  [Brief, page 3.]                                          
               Adhesives having a tan * outside the quadrangle ABCD are               
          said to have insufficient adhesion and “quick stick” for                    
          appellants’ purposes (specification, page 8).                               
               A copy of claim 18, the sole independent claim on appeal,              
          appears in the appendix to appellants’ brief.                               
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                
          Fischer et al (Fischer)            3,438,371      Apr. 15, 1969             
          Noda et al (Noda)                  4,455,146      Jun. 19, 1984             


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007