Ex parte DAWLEY et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2899                                                        
          Application No. 08/632,687                                                  


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Fellows        4,030,415                               Jun. 21,             
          1977                                                                        
          Smith          4,056,057                               Nov. 01,             
          1977                                                                        
          Fischer                  4,589,339                     May  20,             
          1986                                                                        
          Tittgemeyer              4,913,048                     Apr. 03,             
          1990                                                                        
          Vrotacoe                 5,245,923                     Sep. 21,             
          1993                                                                        

          Arkell                   1,401,695                     Jul. 30,             
          1975                                                                        
          (British)                                                                   
               The appealed claims stand finally rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103(a) on the following grounds:                                          
          (1) Claims 32 through 35, 37 and 38, unpatentable over Fellows              
          in view of Arkell;                                                          
          (2) Claim 36, unpatentable over Fellows in view of Arkell and               
          Smith; and                                                                  
          (3) Claim 39, unpatentable over Fellows in view of Arkell in                
          combination with Tittgemeyer, Vrotacoe or Fischer.                          
               The full text of the examiner's rejections and response                
          to the arguments presented by the appellants appears in the                 
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007