Appeal No. 1998-3027
Application No. 08/546,179
fingers.” Takenouchi adds nothing with regard to the
deficiencies of the references discussed supra relative to
this limitation.
We have sustained the rejection of claim 16 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 but we have not sustained the rejections of claims 1, 5,
9, 11, 12 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007